- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:11:52 -0700
- To: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 17:13:34 UTC
At 11:06 +0200 1/05/09, Felix Sasaki wrote: >Hi all, > >I had a look at the very impressive working draft of the media >fragments wg. This section ><http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-frags-reqs-20090430/#MediaFragmentApproaches>http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-frags-reqs-20090430/#MediaFragmentApproaches >made me think whether we could benefit from two properties >spatialMediaFragment >temporalMediaFragment >and potentially >namedMediaFragment >the mappings are already in the section cited above, inclding the >potential return types for the API. are these annotations or requests? I have a harder time seeing them as annotations. But I do see a declarative syntax for 'cue ranges' as a possible desirable candidate. <http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#cue-ranges> > >Comments? > >Felix -- David Singer Multimedia Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Friday, 1 May 2009 17:13:34 UTC