- From: Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:05:15 +0100
- To: <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
- Cc: "Daniel Park" <soohongp@gmail.com>
Dear all, The results from the format survey can be summarized as follows (the lowest sum wins): Media RSS 2+1+3= 6 EXIF 1+5+1= 7 Youtube 4+2+4= 10 TV-Anytime 5+7+3=15 ID3 frames 5+4+7=16 MPEG-7 =8+6+2= 16 EBUCore 7+3+8= 19 This indicates the groups' average level of interest for each format. Unfortunately iTunes ant QT was not added to the survey, since it appeared later in the mapping table. The chairs of the group regret this and it was recorded at today's telecom that there is an interest in the group for those formats as well (see minutes to appear at: http://www.w3.org/2009/03/17-mediaann-minutes.html). These formats are included in the table for review: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Format_mapping_review#Reference_Material The purpose of this activity was to achieve a consensus on which formats to put more attention to during the review and editing process. Hopefully this collaborative work is of a generic character and can be reused for the other more complex or specific formats. Regards Joakim
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 16:47:18 UTC