- From: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:19:19 +0100
- To: "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>
- CC: Pierre-Antoine <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, Joakim Söderberg <joakim.soderberg@ericsson.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
> One reasons for not including size were that it does not apply to > fragments, while the other two properties do. Why? > I also believe that > Dave was in favour of having bit rate instead of file size w.r.t. > streaming media. For streaming media, I understand it better. > We can nonetheless decide to add file size, but looking at it more > globally, there are many properties in many formats that might be > useful in some cases but cannot be mapped to ma:* - that's inevitable > when defining a small set of properties. That is very true as a general remark. I guess one way to decide is to see what would be the usage of the various ma properties. The question is therefore: is the fileSize a sufficiently important annotation property to be explicitly represented? Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Monday, 7 December 2009 10:20:20 UTC