Doing my review for ID3, I noticed two mentions in the mapping table, in the descriptions of XMP properties, that are not from the XMP spec. "In dc:title" (in the description of xmpDM:album) "In dc:creator (in the description of xmpDM:composer) "Related to dc:extend" (xmpDM:duration) "Belong to dc:description" Also I think it is a good idea (there are definitely overlaps btwn dc: and xmpDM:), I think this is matter to discussion as well... So I raise a question that Véronique raised once: shouldn't we review the DC / XMP mapping, even if DC is supposed to be a part of XMP? (I consider it all the more relevant that I noticed some discrepancies btw definition of DC terms btw the Dublin Core documents and the XMP documents) paReceived on Thursday, 2 April 2009 16:13:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:24:34 UTC