- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:45:34 +0900
- To: Véronique Malaisé <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>
- CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Hi Veronique, all, Véronique Malaisé さんは書きました: > > erik mannens wrote: > >> (more generic) use cases for the media ontology >> >> =============================== >> >> · multimedia search >> >> o classic facetted browsing (cfr. /facet [1]) >> >> o software agents matching user preferences with media annotations >> (cfr. [2]) >> >> o matching/merging UC of Veronique Malaise in her mail last friday >> > Some references for this use case are the STITCH project > (http://www.cs.vu.nl/STITCH/) and the Europeana project > (http://www.europeana.eu/) Issue 6083. > >> · multimedia adaptation >> >> o adapting multimedia streams on shot or scene level, based on its >> media annotations (e.g., remove violent scenes which were indicated >> in the media annotation) >> >> o Region Of Interest selection. Select only a specific region from >> the frame/image, based on its media annotations >> >> · multimedia presentation >> >> o enhanced multimedia players (for example [3] and [4]) >> >> · multimedia sharing >> >> o between different users >> >> o between different platforms (e.g., Flickr, Picasa, Webshots, ...) >> >> · tagging (cfr. MMSEM use case [5]) >> >> [1] Hildebrand et al.: <a >> href="http://www..springerlink.com/content/d13t53k0022072t5/ >> <http://www.springerlink.com/content/d13t53k0022072t5/>">/facet: A >> browser for heterogeneous semantic web repositories</a>. >> >> [2] Park et al. <a >> href="http://www..w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/SAMSUNG.pdf >> <http://www.w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/SAMSUNG.pdf>">Video >> Recommendation Based on User Preference on the Web</a>. >> >> [3] http://www.viddler.com/ >> >> [4] http://www.viewzi.com >> >> [5] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-interoperability/#tagging >> >> Metadata standard description >> >> =================== >> >> From the MMSEM XG we could extract following strandards: >> >> · still images: VRA, Exif, DIG35, PhotoRDF >> > I was having a look at the IPTC Standard for Photo Metadata, which has > a stong overlap with NewsML, both sharing the controled vocabulary for > (content and controlled) semantic annotation and a set of metadata > features. I will send my document today to the list. > >> · audio: ID3, MusicBrainz, MusicXML >> >> · audio/video: MPEG-7, AAF, MXF >> >> · presentations: SMIL, SVG >> >> · specific domains: NewsML, TVAnytime, P-Meta >> >> · other: Dublin Core, XMP, MPEG-21 I see XMP listed as "others", and You mentioned XMP also in your "IPTC-Photo Metadata" mail briefly, but doesn't it relate to issue 6077 "photos"? At http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-vocabularies/ "3.6.2 XMP and IPTC Metadata for XMP", there is: "There is a growing number of commercial applications that already support XMP. For example, the International Press and Telecommunications Council (IPTC) has integrated XMP in its Image Metadata specifications and almost every Adobe application like Photoshop or In-Design supports XMP. IPTC Metadata for XMP can be considered as a multimedia metadata format for describing still images and could actually be soon the most used one. " Felix >> >> We should “pick one metadata standard and pull out requirements, but >> not tight to the XG document”. There are not many other standards to >> be elaborated on, right? It was the task of our XG to make an >> exhaustive listing. Couldn’t we start just using all these documents >> from the late MMSEM XG (as Tobias already started)? >> >> Some last thought >> >> ============ >> >> · we should not be too specific and also try to solve generic use cases >> >> Sincere greetings and ‘till next week, >> >> Davy & Erik >> >> Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201 >> >> B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium >> >> T: +32 9 331 49 93 >> >> F: +32 9 331 48 96 >> >> M: +32 473 27 44 17 >> >> http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2008 06:46:16 UTC