Re: New Editors Note for 2.4.1

Looks pretty good to me.

Two small suggestions and one question:

   - capitalize Excel
   - period after template
   - For the last part, "which currently has the latest set of proof points
   <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-2054553260577760934_dfn-proof-point>."
   --> Coming back to read it a few times I'm not sure if it's saying the
   excel doc is the most accurate or the document. Would it be clearer if we
   said they should refer to the document (with a link to the section) for the
   full list of proof points?


On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 1:46 PM Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>
wrote:

> Well what does everyone think?  Is this paragraph good to go?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Charles
>
> EOM
>
>
>
> *From: *Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>
> *Date: *Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 9:03 AM
> *To: *public-maturity@w3.org <public-maturity@w3.org>
> *Subject: *New Editors Note for 2.4.1
>
> How does this sound?
>
>
>
> EDITOR'S NOTE
>
> This spreadsheet is experimental and is a work in progress. The proof
> points <#m_-2054553260577760934_dfn-proof-point> of each dimension
> <#m_-2054553260577760934_dfn-dimension> may not be in sync between this
> document and what is in the latest excel spreadsheet template which
> currently has the latest set of proof points
> <#m_-2054553260577760934_dfn-proof-point>.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Charles
>
> EOM
>
>
>
> Charles LaPierre
>
> Principal, Accessibility and Content Quality Architect
>
> Benetech
>
> Twitter: @CLaPierreA11Y
>