Re: New Editors Note for 2.4.1

And Sheri beat me to it ;)

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 1:58 PM Stacey Swinehart <stacey.swinehart@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Looks pretty good to me.
>
> Two small suggestions and one question:
>
>    - capitalize Excel
>    - period after template
>    - For the last part, "which currently has the latest set of proof
>    points
>    <https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#m_-2054553260577760934_dfn-proof-point>."
>    --> Coming back to read it a few times I'm not sure if it's saying the
>    excel doc is the most accurate or the document. Would it be clearer if we
>    said they should refer to the document (with a link to the section) for the
>    full list of proof points?
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 1:46 PM Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Well what does everyone think?  Is this paragraph good to go?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Charles
>>
>> EOM
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Charles LaPierre <charlesl@benetech.org>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, August 16, 2023 at 9:03 AM
>> *To: *public-maturity@w3.org <public-maturity@w3.org>
>> *Subject: *New Editors Note for 2.4.1
>>
>> How does this sound?
>>
>>
>>
>> EDITOR'S NOTE
>>
>> This spreadsheet is experimental and is a work in progress. The proof
>> points <#m_-1763484143939628430_m_-2054553260577760934_dfn-proof-point> of
>> each dimension
>> <#m_-1763484143939628430_m_-2054553260577760934_dfn-dimension> may not
>> be in sync between this document and what is in the latest excel
>> spreadsheet template which currently has the latest set of proof points
>> <#m_-1763484143939628430_m_-2054553260577760934_dfn-proof-point>.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Charles
>>
>> EOM
>>
>>
>>
>> Charles LaPierre
>>
>> Principal, Accessibility and Content Quality Architect
>>
>> Benetech
>>
>> Twitter: @CLaPierreA11Y
>>
>