- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:05:10 -0800
- To: public-mathml4@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkAq=7GMFFVn4aAwKLN_KubUP-5YaBRxemPzi2yVBjFuKw@mail.gmail.com>
Typo -- meeting is Feb 4 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu> Date: Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:34 PM Subject: Reminder: MathML Intent meeting 2 Feb, 2021 To: <public-mathml4@w3.org> We meet on Thursday, 10am Pacific, 1pm Eastern, 7pm Central European Time. We will be using the zoom link from last week. If you would like to join and don't have the link, please send me email at least 10 minutes before the meeting. 1. Announcements/updates 2. What's missing from Level 1? 3. Start discussion: what's the intent of 'intent'... We've spent the last couple of meetings discussing level 3 ideas. I think we have neglected level 1. In looking through some speech rules, I see a number of items that aren't covered by level 1 (or level 2) that I think belong. Please take a look at the level 1 functionality <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1EsWou1K5nxBdLPvQapdoA9h-s8lg_qjn8fJH64g9izQ/edit#gid=0> and see if you see anything missing that should be discussed. The last item on the agenda is something that I'm sure will provide some lively/thought provoking debate for several calls: what do we want the 'intent' attr to convey? We've tacitly(?) assumed it allowed software to understand what the author intended at the level of being able to be converted to something like Content MathML (CMML). But Deyan and some others have suggested that accessibility should be the primary concern. We have seen a few examples where the current intent proposal is structured for CMML and not accessibility (integral example with variable of integration in the numerator). What other notations are like this and does it matter? intent="integral(...)" doesn't really tell AT anything that isn't already obvious since there is only one use for an integral sign. Maybe that's not the case with some other examples. Perhaps there should be a prize for the most divergent case of speech and CMML? :-) <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#m_-4834863262619063512_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2021 15:05:38 UTC