Re: TAG review of MathML-Core

Looks good with a minor formatting typos noted below

Tests: + core <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/mathml>
> + Proposed exposed CSS properties (not necessary to expose to authors
> initially, but we think good to) * math-script-level and math-style
> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/css/css-fonts/math-script-level-and-math-style>
> * text-transform values
> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/css/text-transform/math>
>

*What data does this specification expose to an origin? Please also
> document what data is identical to data exposed by other features, in the
> same or different contexts.* * Nothing
>

The "* xxx"s should be on a separate line, shouldn't they?

    Neil


On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 6:50 AM Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote:

> As part of the process, we will need to send a request for a W3C TAG
> review of MathML-Core very soon.  Fred, Rob and I put together a draft of
> this that you can see at
> https://gist.github.com/bkardell/46ed26841c5a730a5eb878eb3f96f1ad
>
> It would be great if people could look, comment about edits you think
> should happen, and say whether you'd like to be listed as a primary contact
> or @ mention replies (you can also just watch it once it posts).  We've
> kept it currently to just the people involved in the initial writing.
>
> We'd like to get this filed ASAP because we need to try to get on the
> agenda for December's F2F meeting and that will be pretty hard if we don't
> file it soon.  Do we think this is a thing we can resolve async? Should we
> set up a special 1-off meeting?  Or do we wait until next week?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: bkardell.com
>