- From: Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:02:01 -0700
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-mathml4@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAESRWkAR48DZYD7mxREMbXqrYdRaWLi67EEWyhcOvPhFHEYnkA@mail.gmail.com>
Looks good with a minor formatting typos noted below Tests: + core <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/mathml> > + Proposed exposed CSS properties (not necessary to expose to authors > initially, but we think good to) * math-script-level and math-style > <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/css/css-fonts/math-script-level-and-math-style> > * text-transform values > <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/css/text-transform/math> > *What data does this specification expose to an origin? Please also > document what data is identical to data exposed by other features, in the > same or different contexts.* * Nothing > The "* xxx"s should be on a separate line, shouldn't they? Neil On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 6:50 AM Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > As part of the process, we will need to send a request for a W3C TAG > review of MathML-Core very soon. Fred, Rob and I put together a draft of > this that you can see at > https://gist.github.com/bkardell/46ed26841c5a730a5eb878eb3f96f1ad > > It would be great if people could look, comment about edits you think > should happen, and say whether you'd like to be listed as a primary contact > or @ mention replies (you can also just watch it once it posts). We've > kept it currently to just the people involved in the initial writing. > > We'd like to get this filed ASAP because we need to try to get on the > agenda for December's F2F meeting and that will be pretty hard if we don't > file it soon. Do we think this is a thing we can resolve async? Should we > set up a special 1-off meeting? Or do we wait until next week? > > > Thanks! > > -- > Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: bkardell.com >
Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:02:17 UTC