Re: TAG review of MathML-Core

Thanks Neil, good catch -- we moved this briefly to another medium in order
to co-edit and it seems a bunch of formatting was messed up in the
translation - I thought I had gotten them all but... good eyes :)



On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 6:02 PM Neil Soiffer <soiffer@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> Looks good with a minor formatting typos noted below
>
> Tests: + core
>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/mathml> +
>> Proposed exposed CSS properties (not necessary to expose to authors
>> initially, but we think good to) * math-script-level and math-style
>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/css/css-fonts/math-script-level-and-math-style>
>> * text-transform values
>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/css/text-transform/math>
>>
>
> *What data does this specification expose to an origin? Please also
>> document what data is identical to data exposed by other features, in the
>> same or different contexts.* * Nothing
>>
>
> The "* xxx"s should be on a separate line, shouldn't they?
>
>     Neil
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 6:50 AM Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As part of the process, we will need to send a request for a W3C TAG
>> review of MathML-Core very soon.  Fred, Rob and I put together a draft of
>> this that you can see at
>> https://gist.github.com/bkardell/46ed26841c5a730a5eb878eb3f96f1ad
>>
>> It would be great if people could look, comment about edits you think
>> should happen, and say whether you'd like to be listed as a primary contact
>> or @ mention replies (you can also just watch it once it posts).  We've
>> kept it currently to just the people involved in the initial writing.
>>
>> We'd like to get this filed ASAP because we need to try to get on the
>> agenda for December's F2F meeting and that will be pretty hard if we don't
>> file it soon.  Do we think this is a thing we can resolve async? Should we
>> set up a special 1-off meeting?  Or do we wait until next week?
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: bkardell.com
>>
>

-- 
Brian Kardell :: @briankardell :: bkardell.com

Received on Tuesday, 29 October 2019 22:26:40 UTC