- From: Pablo Olmos de Aguilera C. <pablo@glatelier.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:24:47 -0300
- To: marbux <marbux@gmail.com>
- Cc: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
Every implementation supports any number of trailing hashes. What's the point on removing something that is already widely supported? I have been following every mail on the list and still don't understand... On 22 November 2012 22:41, marbux <marbux@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Max Albrecht <1@178.is> wrote: >> >> On 22 Nov 2012, at 23:39, marbux <marbux@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> A somewhat different approach >> when implementations' markup differs >> >> >> It has already been established[1] that the implementation DON'T differ. >> There are all in line with the spec in regard to the headers. >> >> Why should a new spec differ from all that? > > Sorry, I should have been more clear. My point was in regarding to the > preceding discussion in the last few posts of whether to support hash > marks trailing headers and if so, how many. > > Paul > -- Pablo Olmos de Aguilera Corradini - @PaBLoX http://www.glatelier.org/ http://about.me/pablox/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/pablooda/ Linux User: #456971 - http://counter.li.org/
Received on Friday, 23 November 2012 03:25:49 UTC