- From: marbux <marbux@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:41:29 -0800
- To: Markdown List <public-markdown@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Max Albrecht <1@178.is> wrote: > > On 22 Nov 2012, at 23:39, marbux <marbux@gmail.com> wrote: > > A somewhat different approach > when implementations' markup differs > > > It has already been established[1] that the implementation DON'T differ. > There are all in line with the spec in regard to the headers. > > Why should a new spec differ from all that? Sorry, I should have been more clear. My point was in regarding to the preceding discussion in the last few posts of whether to support hash marks trailing headers and if so, how many. Paul
Received on Friday, 23 November 2012 01:42:00 UTC