Re: Agenda Low Vision Task Force 5 Sept 2019

Hi Jim,

For the meeting I’ve created a spreadsheet to evaluate the examples:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WBUakVVdJh2alhSpacgUekEQL8HFMK9oMeq6IswdZVw/edit?usp=sharing (group editable)

I think it would be very useful to get an ‘LVTF rating’ for each example.

That would basically be a score out of 10 for how visible each focus indicator is. Partly from LVTF members perceptions, but also informed by Andy’s analysis.

Then we can compare the different metrics/testing methods against the perceived visibility.

Cheers,

-Alastair


From: Jim Allan

Time: 11:00 am Eastern Time (GMT-04:00)
IRC: irc.w3.org:6665/<http://irc.w3.org:6665/>  #lvtf
Teleconference connection info (requires W3C login permission):   https://www.w3.org/2017/08/01-lvtf-info.html


Agenda+ scribe
Agenda+ focus visible - review on 2.2<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g9_WBgfhViWAaRFIWWt10CP5rBsEVIWm3vT1vWqrHvI/edit#heading=h.s1rdduthbnva>
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-low-vision-a11y-tf/2019Aug/0015.html

new test page: https://www.tsbvi.edu/web/tests/focus-more-visible3.html


concern about Bad Result  on Examples 3, 5, 8, 12,

dotted vs solid, thickness, space between outline and object, etc. any research on any of the aspect.
any thoughts review it all, more examples, better examples.

--
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9452 http://www.tsbvi.edu/

"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964