- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 08:54:01 -0500
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: Jim Allan <jimallan@tsbvi.edu>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Alastair, > I’d either drop one of them, or make it an “or”, e.g: > “hover and/or focus are not the only means of accessing the informational > content _or_ it does not include information necessary to _understand_ the > page” +1 using "or". Kindest Regards, Laura On 7/7/17, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi Jim, Laura, > > Looking at the wiki version, the last two bullets (other method & not > important) seem to clash, logically. > > If there is another method, does it matter whether there is important info > in the pop-over or not? > If it is not important, does it matter there is another method? > > I’d either drop one of them, or make it an “or”, e.g: > “hover and/or focus are not the only means of accessing the informational > content _or_ it does not include information necessary to _understand_ the > page” > > Also, does ‘content’ include navigation? If so I’d consider navigation > important content, which makes all drop-down menus fail. Perhaps not, that > might be too pernickety. > > Cheers, > > -Alastair > > > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Friday, 7 July 2017 13:54:34 UTC