Re: personalization as a technique - was Re: New Wiki page with SC text proposals to combine issues 79, 78, and 74

Maybe you could make a page on the LVTF wiki for personalization requirements with suggested values? I do not want lose some in my inbox....


Also can we have 5 recommended settings for each one. These will be used for test case...However  we can have user settings per role or type. So you might want borders and margins on buttons and not on links etc,




Take a look at the json file at https://github.com/ayelet-seeman/coga.personalisation/blob/JSON-Script/json_profile_1.json


we could have an coga function inheriting the button characteristics and define them


Anyway, this is great stuff, thanks


All the best

Lisa Seeman

LinkedIn, Twitter





---- On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 21:03:36 +0200 Jim Allan<jimallan@tsbvi.edu> wrote ---- 

In addition to Laura's list, and Glenda's disabled element, also consider

lowvision-fontsize
lowvison-reflow

lowvision-hyphenate

lowvision-justification
​
lowvision-margins

lowvision-borders

lowvision-element-spacing


On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Lisa,
 
 Interesting. Are you thinking of adding attributes for low vision that
 would address 79, 78, and 74 such as:
 
 lowvision-fontfamily
 lowvision-foreground
 lowvision-background
 lowvision-lineheight
 lowvision-letterspacing
 lowvision-wordspacing
​


 Thank you!
 
 Kindest regards,
 Laura
 
 On 1/30/17, lisa.seeman <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:
 > Hi Alistair and Low Vision task force
 >
 > We are working on a full personalization architecture and will have a free
 > browser extension
 >
 > We will have a specification for both the semantics and the personalization
 > settings https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/ it is under the
 > aria working group.
 > A first open implementation is at
 > https://github.com/ayelet-seeman/coga.personalisation and there is a demo at
 > http://rawgit.com/ayelet-seeman/coga.personalisation/demo/conactUs.html
 > IBM and Pearson are saying they intend also to implement it (although
 > clearly I can not commit for either of them by CR it should have at least 2
 > implementations )
 >
 > Should someone from the low vision task force coordinate with me to ensure
 > LV personalization settings are fully addressed?
 >
 > Also than you can add personalization as a technique. This makes it much
 > easier to make it widely applicable.
 >
 > We are addressing the testing burden by having a maximum of 5 recommended
 > settings per user setting. So developers can test all recomended settings by
 > testing against 5 templates.
 >
 > All the best
 >
 > Lisa Seeman
 >
 > LinkedIn, Twitter
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > ---- On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 01:16:54 +0200 Alastair
 > Campbell<acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote ----
 >
 > Hi everyone,
 >
 > Thinking about the(se) adaptation Success Criteria, I really think the
 > process is more important than the SC text at this stage.
 >
 > As I outlined before:
 > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2017JanMar/0418.html
 >
 > I think we need an *open* process to test the limits of what a user-side
 > script or extension can do, to find out what authors can reasonably do.
 >
 > These things are not new, the Opera browser used to have user-stylesheets
 > that adjusted colours, layouts etc. There are extensions now that pull out
 > content and re-format it. But there is no standard, no one has tried to
 > define it in an open way.
 >
 > We need to have a preliminary requirement (SC text), then test, write and
 > test again.
 >
 > If we don’t have an initial stake in the ground (of the SC text) then there
 > is no point putting the effort into testing and writing techniques, but if
 > we do, we have a plan and the SC text can be modified later based on the
 > results.
 >
 > Cheers,
 >
 > -Alastair
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 >
 
 
 

--
 Laura L. Carlson
 
 



-- 
Jim Allan, Accessibility Coordinator

Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9264  http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." McLuhan, 1964