- From: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:26:23 -0400
- To: "'Laura Carlson'" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'AlastairCampbell'" <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "'public-low-vision-a11y-tf'" <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Laura, Thanks! So if I am correct about the requirements of 2.1.... That would mean maybe trying to combine the 2 NEW SC, Seeing All Interface Elements and Size of All Content. Leaving Resize Text as is. * katie * Katie Haritos-Shea Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA) Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 | @ryladog -----Original Message----- From: Laura Carlson [mailto:laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:07 AM To: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com> Cc: AlastairCampbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org> Subject: Re: Combining the sizing SCs Hi Katie, Alastair, and all, I wonder if we make a new combined SC for those 2, we should fold in the current "Seeing All Interface Elements" too. All 3 (Seeing All Interface Elements, Size of All Content, and "Text Size") seem to overlap. Thanks, Laura [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Seeing_All_Interface_Elements Reference LVFT Success Criteria Progress Table: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Tracking_Success_Criteria_Progress On 10/3/16, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote: > Alistair, > > While this seems like a good idea, remember that 2.1 has to be 100% > backwards compatable (in that it will add new things, but all of the > old things will still be true), so it may be more complicated to so. > > In other words you would still have to have the Resize SC (with it > existing > number) and a Resize Text plus Resize Content (with a new number). So > it seems best to just make the new idea, Resize Content by itself the > new number. > > We *do* want to combine all NEW SC ideas as much as we can, but > combining old with a new will be much harder to do, considering our > requirements for 2.1. > > Do others agree or disagree that this is consistant with one of the > goals of 2.1? > > Katie Haritos-Shea > 703-371-5545 > > On Oct 3, 2016 4:59 AM, "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> >> >> I’m not sure how many people track the github issues, but I added one >> on Friday about the sizing SCs: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-SC/issues/16 >> >> >> >> It covers the issues that came up at the meeting in TPAC, and >> proposes a replacement for Sizing All Content & Text-Sizing. >> >> >> >> I don’t have access to editing the LVTF wiki area, but it’s probably >> best to have a new one and copy over some of the associated text for >> benefits, techniques etc. >> >> >> >> Is it best to discuss on-list or on-github? >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> >> -Alastair >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Alastair Campbell >> >> >> >> www.nomensa.com >> >> tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653 >> >> follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc >> >> >> >> Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT >> >> Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411 -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 14:26:58 UTC