- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 09:06:34 -0500
- To: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com>
- Cc: AlastairCampbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Katie, Alastair, and all, I wonder if we make a new combined SC for those 2, we should fold in the current "Seeing All Interface Elements" too. All 3 (Seeing All Interface Elements, Size of All Content, and "Text Size") seem to overlap. Thanks, Laura [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Seeing_All_Interface_Elements Reference LVFT Success Criteria Progress Table: https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Tracking_Success_Criteria_Progress On 10/3/16, Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@gmail.com> wrote: > Alistair, > > While this seems like a good idea, remember that 2.1 has to be 100% > backwards compatable (in that it will add new things, but all of the old > things will still be true), so it may be more complicated to so. > > In other words you would still have to have the Resize SC (with it existing > number) and a Resize Text plus Resize Content (with a new number). So it > seems best to just make the new idea, Resize Content by itself the new > number. > > We *do* want to combine all NEW SC ideas as much as we can, but combining > old with a new will be much harder to do, considering our requirements for > 2.1. > > Do others agree or disagree that this is consistant with one of the goals > of 2.1? > > Katie Haritos-Shea > 703-371-5545 > > On Oct 3, 2016 4:59 AM, "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> >> >> I’m not sure how many people track the github issues, but I added one on >> Friday about the sizing SCs: >> >> https://github.com/w3c/low-vision-SC/issues/16 >> >> >> >> It covers the issues that came up at the meeting in TPAC, and proposes a >> replacement for Sizing All Content & Text-Sizing. >> >> >> >> I don’t have access to editing the LVTF wiki area, but it’s probably best >> to have a new one and copy over some of the associated text for benefits, >> techniques etc. >> >> >> >> Is it best to discuss on-list or on-github? >> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> >> -Alastair >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Alastair Campbell >> >> >> >> www.nomensa.com >> >> tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653 >> >> follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc >> >> >> >> Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT >> >> Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411 -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 3 October 2016 14:07:06 UTC