W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org > November 2016

RE: Metadata On Hover SC Text

From: Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 12:31:55 -0500
To: "'Alastair Campbell'" <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "'Laura Carlson'" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: "'public-low-vision-a11y-tf'" <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1b7901d240f8$7e2e3430$7a8a9c90$@gmail.com>
I like this Alistair. Sorry about the switch on obscure


* katie *
Katie Haritos-Shea 
Principal ICT Accessibility Architect (WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA)
Cell: 703-371-5545 | ryladog@gmail.com | Oakton, VA | LinkedIn Profile | Office: 703-371-5545 | @ryladog

-----Original Message-----
From: Alastair Campbell [mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 11:59 AM
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>; Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL <ryladog@gmail.com>
Cc: public-low-vision-a11y-tf <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Metadata On Hover SC Text

Katie’s version had:
> * not obscured by other content,

That has been switched from “does not obscure other content” to “not obscured by other content”, I think the first one was the intent?

However, having a mouse-over that obscures other content is exactly how drop-down menus are intended to work, it is too wide.

How about:
Informational content which appears on hover that is necessary for understanding must:
* be discernible,
* not obscure other content, and
* be available via any input method
“Informational content” to remove navigation elements like menus, and switching the obscure point back to the original intent.


Received on Thursday, 17 November 2016 17:32:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:23:23 UTC