- From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:44:07 +0000
- To: Erich Manser <emanser@us.ibm.com>
- CC: LVTF - low-vision-a11y <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2016 17:44:44 UTC
Thanks Erich, that’s really useful. Regarding a couple of them (the disagreements obviously!): “6. Would say FAIL - I would need the mouse-over aspects to supplement perception, if we're ignoring mouse-over, color distinctions are difficult” http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/ Were the state labels (WA, OR etc.) not enough to understand it? I.e. Do the state lines need to be contrasting? “13. Would say FAIL - unable to locate the labels A, B and C (are they in the graphic itself?)” http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/details.php?id=PIA20746 The labels are terrible, I’m not surprised the red text on green background isn’t visible! However, I thought that the graph itself was understandable without the labels, could you see where the bright green parts were on the time-scale of the X axis? (Showing them clustered around the summer months.) Thinking about it, that one would fail for text on a background anyway, I’ll update it. “Also, did we do away with using the COGA definition of "Important Information", or modified?” I’ve left it as-is for the moment, I think it covers what we need. I re-quoted it at the top of the page, and it is still on the wiki page. Cheers, -Alastair
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2016 17:44:44 UTC