- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 15:36:46 -0600
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: Erich Manser <emanser@us.ibm.com>, LVTF - low-vision-a11y <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Alastair, Erich, and all, On 11/8/16, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > “Also, did we do away with using the COGA definition of "Important > Information", or modified?” > > I’ve left it as-is for the moment, I think it covers what we need. I > re-quoted it at the top of the page, and it is still on the wiki page. If COGA's definition covers what we need, let's use it. If not, we could make our own definition. COGA's definition [1] is fairly broad. I wonder if it would apply it to all of the graphical examples? [2]. Thoughts? Kindest Regards, Laura [1] https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/low-vision-a11y-tf/wiki/Informational_Graphic_Contrast_(Minimum)#Related_Glossary_additions_or_changes [2] https://alastairc.ac/tests/graphic-contrast-test.html -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2016 21:37:21 UTC