- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:45:21 -0500
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com>, LVTF - low-vision-a11y <public-low-vision-a11y-tf@w3.org>
Hi Alistair, +1. Thank you! Some example graphic icons: https://www.graphicstock.com/stock-image/gray-small-icons https://www.graphicstock.com/stock-image/shopping-minimal-flat-icon-vector-set-52657 https://www.graphicstock.com/stock-image/3d-web-mail-icons-set-106744 https://www.graphicstock.com/stock-image/icon-set-169252 https://www.graphicstock.com/stock-image/blue-web-icons-set https://www.graphicstock.com/stock-image/glossy-islamic-icons-set https://www.graphicstock.com/stock-image/islamic-website-icons-set-168411 Social Media Icons on: http://growthlab.cid.harvard.edu/#boxes-box-1436801597 http://iconsetc.com/icon-set/social-media/?style=flat-circle-white-on-silver http://www.iconsdb.com/silver-icons/firefox-icon.html http://www.iconsdb.com/silver-icons/google-drive-icon.html https://www.colourbox.com/vector/home-flat-white-color-icon-vector-15287421 https://www.colourbox.com/vector/search-flat-white-color-icon-vector-15287439 https://thumb1.shutterstock.com/display_pic_with_logo/615538/350963873/stock-vector-collaboration-vector-icon-style-is-flat-rounded-square-button-white-and-silver-colors-white-350963873.jpg Kindest Regards, Laura On 11/3/16, Wayne Dick <wayneedick@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Alistair, > > That looks right. > > Wayne > > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com> wrote: >> Great idea, Alastair. +1 >> >> G >> >> P.S. And as a fall back position, we could add an option to provide an >> easily findable "good contrast version" of an info graphic...as an >> alternative. My thought is...it would give designers a way to have more >> flexibility (if needed)...while still have a fallback infographic with >> good >> contrast...and hopefully, most designers would find that they prefer to >> make >> only one version of the graphic because it is less work. >> >> >> >> glenda sims | team a11y lead | deque.com | 512.963.3773 >> >> web for everyone. web on everything. - w3 goals >> >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alastair Campbell >> <acampbell@nomensa.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Everyone, >>> >>> >>> >>> Immediately after the call I started putting Glenda’s update to the SC >>> text in, and whilst doing that the similarity with the current 1.4.3 >>> sprang >>> to mind. >>> >>> >>> >>> How about aligning more closely with 1.4.3? >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------- >>> >>> The visual presentation of important information in graphical elements >>> has >>> a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 against the immediate surrounding >>> background, except for the following: >>> >>> >>> >>> Thicker lines: where the minimum width of the line is at least 3px the >>> graphic has a contrast ratio of at least 3:1; >>> Incidental: Graphical elements that are not required for the >>> understanding >>> of the graphic, that are pure decoration, that have the information >>> duplicated elsewhere on the same page have no contrast requirement; >>> Logotypes: Graphics that are part of a logo or brand name have no >>> minimum >>> contrast requirement. >>> >>> ---------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> I went with “graphical elements” to open up the further description to >>> sub-graphics, e.g. a line in an info-graphic is a graphical element, and >>> if >>> it is important then it should have contrast against its surroundings. >>> >>> >>> >>> As I said, if anyone has particularly good/bad examples of graphics >>> please >>> send them to me and I’ll try testing this against them. >>> >>> >>> >>> -Alastair >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> Alastair Campbell >>> >>> >>> >>> www.nomensa.com >>> >>> tel: +44 (0)117 929 7333 / 07970 879 653 >>> >>> follow us: @we_are_nomensa or me: @alastc >>> >>> >>> >>> Nomensa Ltd. King William House, 13 Queen Square, Bristol BS1 4NT >>> >>> Company number: 4214477 | UK VAT registration: GB 771727411 >> >> > > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2016 18:45:55 UTC