- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:18:58 -0500
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <69703926-ce41-ad92-3da6-15aa40dbc8a8@openlinksw.com>
On 1/17/17 9:36 AM, Matt Wallis wrote: > On 13/01/2017 12:45, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> On 1/12/17 8:28 AM, Matt Wallis wrote: >>> >>> Is there an existing predicate that I can simply add to my resource >>> description? Like this: >>> >>> my:object a my:Thing . >>> my:object predicate >>> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948> . >>> >> >> Hi Matt, >> >> There are many RDF statement predicates that could be used to >> associate my:object with >> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948>. What's most >> important is the nature of the predicate used, with regards to what >> you are trying to communicate. Thus, the entity type identified by >> my:object is quite important i.e., does it identify a Person, >> Organization, or something else? >> >> In a very loose sense, you could state: >> >> { >> >> @prefix my: <#> . >> >> @prefix schema: <http://schema.org/> . >> >> @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> . >> >> my:object schema:isRelatedTo >> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948> . >> >> ## and/or >> >> >> my:object skos:related >> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948> . >> >> } >> >> >> Assuming my:object is a company that is officially identified by: >> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948, you could state: >> >> { >> >> @prefix my: <#> . >> >> @prefix schema: <http://schema.org/> . >> >> @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . >> >> my:object owl:sameAs >> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948> . >> >> } >> > Hi Kingsley, > Thank you for your suggestions. > I think that I am looking for something that is more specific that > isRelatedTo - I want to say that one can expect to find information > about the formal company registration. > I have read various warnings about the overuse of owl:sameAs, and this > makes me cautious about using it. For now, I would prefer to assert a > more specific relationship. That's fine, but you haven't really clarified the nature of the association that you seek. All I've done is provide examples from either side of a broad spectrum :) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software (Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com) Weblogs (Blogs): Legacy Blog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/ Blogspot Blog: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen Profile Pages: Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/ Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Web Identities (WebID): Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this : http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 16:19:25 UTC