- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:18:58 -0500
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <69703926-ce41-ad92-3da6-15aa40dbc8a8@openlinksw.com>
On 1/17/17 9:36 AM, Matt Wallis wrote:
> On 13/01/2017 12:45, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> On 1/12/17 8:28 AM, Matt Wallis wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there an existing predicate that I can simply add to my resource
>>> description? Like this:
>>>
>>> my:object a my:Thing .
>>> my:object predicate
>>> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948> .
>>>
>>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> There are many RDF statement predicates that could be used to
>> associate my:object with
>> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948>. What's most
>> important is the nature of the predicate used, with regards to what
>> you are trying to communicate. Thus, the entity type identified by
>> my:object is quite important i.e., does it identify a Person,
>> Organization, or something else?
>>
>> In a very loose sense, you could state:
>>
>> {
>>
>> @prefix my: <#> .
>>
>> @prefix schema: <http://schema.org/> .
>>
>> @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
>>
>> my:object schema:isRelatedTo
>> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948> .
>>
>> ## and/or
>>
>>
>> my:object skos:related
>> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948> .
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>> Assuming my:object is a company that is officially identified by:
>> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948, you could state:
>>
>> {
>>
>> @prefix my: <#> .
>>
>> @prefix schema: <http://schema.org/> .
>>
>> @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
>>
>> my:object owl:sameAs
>> <http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/08209948> .
>>
>> }
>>
> Hi Kingsley,
> Thank you for your suggestions.
> I think that I am looking for something that is more specific that
> isRelatedTo - I want to say that one can expect to find information
> about the formal company registration.
> I have read various warnings about the overuse of owl:sameAs, and this
> makes me cautious about using it. For now, I would prefer to assert a
> more specific relationship.
That's fine, but you haven't really clarified the nature of the
association that you seek. All I've done is provide examples from either
side of a broad spectrum :)
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software (Home Page: http://www.openlinksw.com)
Weblogs (Blogs):
Legacy Blog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
Blogspot Blog: http://kidehen.blogspot.com
Medium Blog: https://medium.com/@kidehen
Profile Pages:
Pinterest: https://www.pinterest.com/kidehen/
Quora: https://www.quora.com/profile/Kingsley-Uyi-Idehen
Twitter: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Web Identities (WebID):
Personal: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
: http://id.myopenlink.net/DAV/home/KingsleyUyiIdehen/Public/kingsley.ttl#this
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 16:19:25 UTC