W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > August 2016

Re: Vocabulary to describe software projects and their dependencies

From: Paul Worrall <paul.worrall@interition.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:48:58 +0100
Cc: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <202C3C30-43F8-42C1-BBED-72DA03378AF8@interition.net>
To: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
I don’t invest any more time on this project or semantic tech myself but if there was someone who wanted to do it I am happy to advise. 


> On 10 Aug 2016, at 10:40, Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr> wrote:
> 
> Hi Paul,
>> Le 10 août 2016 à 11:26, Paul Worrall <paul.worrall@interition.net <mailto:paul.worrall@interition.net>> a écrit :
>> 
>> I had been working on describing software https://sparqlycode.com/ <https://sparqlycode.com/> .   It used DOAP and PROV and its own vocab. Produced RDF/OWL representations of the code, its build, version history etc.. I could’t get an early adopter so I abondoned it last year.
>> 
>> Would be happy to help someone pick up on the code.
> 
> You can also help the community by submitting the vocabulary [0] for inclusion into LOV [1]. 
> That would be great and a good way to watch any adopter of the vocab.
> 
> [0] http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/suggest <http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/suggest> 
> [1] lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/ <http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Paul Worrall
>> 
>> Interition: wisdom in the web
>> 
>> web: www.interition.net <http://www.interition.net/>, www.zonafide.net <http://www.zonafide.net/>
>> email: paul.worrall@interition.net <mailto:paul.worrall@interition.net>
>> twitter: @interition
>> mobile: +44 (0) 771 133 0213
>> phone: +44 (0) 203 637 5196
>> eth: 0x93d41b29acf6204c9a9f03e335988e498388a2cc
>> 
>> Registered in England and Wales. Number 08460806
>> Registered office: Elm Barn, Stoke Golding Lane, Higham on the Hill, Nuneaton,CV13 6ES
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 9 Aug 2016, at 07:36, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org <mailto:gk@ninebynine.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
>>>> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap <https://github.com/edumbill/doap>
>>>> 
>>>> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not
>>>> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects.
>>> 
>>> Just a thought:  would DOAP + PROV fit the bill?
>>> 
>>> #g
>>> --
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------
> Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
> Mail: ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com <mailto:ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com>
> Web: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <http://www.atemezing.org/>
> Twitter: @gatemezing
> About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing <https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 09:49:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:22:34 UTC