W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > August 2016

Re: Vocabulary to describe software projects and their dependencies

From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:40:30 +0200
Cc: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <AB5A3758-5700-4ACD-BEC2-E109D58BE0B6@eurecom.fr>
To: Paul Worrall <paul.worrall@interition.net>
Hi Paul,
> Le 10 août 2016 à 11:26, Paul Worrall <paul.worrall@interition.net> a écrit :
> 
> I had been working on describing software https://sparqlycode.com/ <https://sparqlycode.com/> .   It used DOAP and PROV and its own vocab. Produced RDF/OWL representations of the code, its build, version history etc.. I could’t get an early adopter so I abondoned it last year.
> 
> Would be happy to help someone pick up on the code.

You can also help the community by submitting the vocabulary [0] for inclusion into LOV [1]. 
That would be great and a good way to watch any adopter of the vocab.

[0] http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/suggest <http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/suggest> 
[1] lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/ <http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/> 

> 
> 
> Paul Worrall
> 
> Interition: wisdom in the web
> 
> web: www.interition.net <http://www.interition.net/>, www.zonafide.net <http://www.zonafide.net/>
> email: paul.worrall@interition.net <mailto:paul.worrall@interition.net>
> twitter: @interition
> mobile: +44 (0) 771 133 0213
> phone: +44 (0) 203 637 5196
> eth: 0x93d41b29acf6204c9a9f03e335988e498388a2cc
> 
> Registered in England and Wales. Number 08460806
> Registered office: Elm Barn, Stoke Golding Lane, Higham on the Hill, Nuneaton,CV13 6ES
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 9 Aug 2016, at 07:36, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org <mailto:gk@ninebynine.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
>>> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap <https://github.com/edumbill/doap>
>>> 
>>> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not
>>> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects.
>> 
>> Just a thought:  would DOAP + PROV fit the bill?
>> 
>> #g
>> --
>> 
>> 
> 

---------------------------------------
Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
Mail: ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
Web: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <http://www.atemezing.org/>
Twitter: @gatemezing
About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing <https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing>









Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 09:41:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:22:34 UTC