W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > August 2016

Re: Vocabulary to describe software projects and their dependencies

From: Tom Johnson <johnson.tom@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 10:01:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJeHiNH9SAKZH4qf59kvQ=2rRb8Ghm0g6DnO4_M60Ev99XDmtg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Worrall <paul.worrall@interition.net>
Cc: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
This crossed my radar today: http://ontologi.es/doap-deps#

On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Paul Worrall <paul.worrall@interition.net>
wrote:

> I don’t invest any more time on this project or semantic tech myself but
> if there was someone who wanted to do it I am happy to advise.
>
>
> On 10 Aug 2016, at 10:40, Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Le 10 août 2016 à 11:26, Paul Worrall <paul.worrall@interition.net> a
> écrit :
>
> I had been working on describing software https://sparqlycode.com/ .   It
> used DOAP and PROV and its own vocab. Produced RDF/OWL representations of
> the code, its build, version history etc.. I could’t get an early adopter
> so I abondoned it last year.
>
> Would be happy to help someone pick up on the code.
>
>
> You can also help the community by submitting the vocabulary [0] for
> inclusion into LOV [1].
> That would be great and a good way to watch any adopter of the vocab.
>
> [0] http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/suggest
> [1] lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/
>
>
>
> Paul Worrall
>
> Interition: wisdom in the web
>
> web: www.interition.net, www.zonafide.net
> email: paul.worrall@interition.net
> twitter: @interition
> mobile: +44 (0) 771 133 0213
> phone: +44 (0) 203 637 5196
> eth: 0x93d41b29acf6204c9a9f03e335988e498388a2cc
>
> Registered in England and Wales. Number 08460806
> Registered office: Elm Barn, Stoke Golding Lane, Higham on the Hill,
> Nuneaton,CV13 6ES
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 9 Aug 2016, at 07:36, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
>
> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap
>
> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not
> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects.
>
>
> Just a thought:  would DOAP + PROV fit the bill?
>
> #g
> --
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Ghislain A. Atemezing, Ph.D
> Mail: ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
> Web: https://w3id.org/people/gatemezing <http://www.atemezing.org/>
> Twitter: @gatemezing
> About Me: https://about.me/ghislain.atemezing
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
-Tom Johnson
Received on Friday, 12 August 2016 17:02:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:22:34 UTC