W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > August 2016

Re: Vocabulary to describe software projects and their dependencies

From: Paul Worrall <paul.worrall@interition.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:26:54 +0100
Cc: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <659E80CE-8452-466D-B69A-6AF842BA69E9@interition.net>
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
I had been working on describing software https://sparqlycode.com/ <https://sparqlycode.com/> .   It used DOAP and PROV and its own vocab. Produced RDF/OWL representations of the code, its build, version history etc.. I could’t get an early adopter so I abondoned it last year.

Would be happy to help someone pick up on the code.


Paul Worrall

Interition: wisdom in the web

web: www.interition.net, www.zonafide.net
email: paul.worrall@interition.net
twitter: @interition
mobile: +44 (0) 771 133 0213
phone: +44 (0) 203 637 5196
eth: 0x93d41b29acf6204c9a9f03e335988e498388a2cc

Registered in England and Wales. Number 08460806
Registered office: Elm Barn, Stoke Golding Lane, Higham on the Hill, Nuneaton,CV13 6ES







> On 9 Aug 2016, at 07:36, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org> wrote:
> 
> On 08/08/2016 14:57, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
>> DOAP vocabulary comes very close: https://github.com/edumbill/doap
>> 
>> Too bad it looks to be unmaintained. Strangely, the schema does not
>> seem to support relationships (dependencies) between projects.
> 
> Just a thought:  would DOAP + PROV fit the bill?
> 
> #g
> --
> 
> 


Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2016 09:27:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:22:34 UTC