- From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 11:02:19 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
+1 to minimize RDF/XML use! I do also think there is the same danger now of JSON-LD being seen as a dialect of JSON, rather than a way to serialize RDF. I have seen people trying to do "JSON-LD" with arbitrary JSON added here and there. Some even interpreted "Linked Data" as meaning "Just make some JSON with arbitrary keys and put it on the web". For many developers who come fresh to RDF/Linked Data - the first thing they see is the serialization and they want to stop there - they have enough other things to worry about. I think that is fine, as long as they don't try to push the serialization further or add additional hidden meanings - RDF as a graph still should be in the back of your mind - e.g. a nested JSON-object in JSON-LD is not magically "owned" by the super-parent. You can have nice-to-have structures, e.g. like you say to do transformations, and also Linked Data By Stealth. I must admit I have even done XML Schemas for documents that just happens to be valid RDF/XML documents - (this was before JSON-LD and Turtle were standards) - this was pushing the envelope in both directions (e.g. needing double-nested XML elements, one for the property, and one for the class) and I wouldn't do this again - but doing similar in the JSON world can still be useful as long as we don't push it too far or hide the RDF semantics too well. On 3 September 2015 at 19:41, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 9/3/15 1:53 PM, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: >> With due respect, I think it would be foolish to burn the bridges to >> XML. The XML standards and infrastructure are very well developed, >> much more so than JSON-LD's. We use XSLT extensively on RDF/XML. > > We don't have to dump RDF/XML per se., we simply need minimize use and > emphasis. For instance, we use RDF/XML extensively in our transformation > middleware, but that's all inside and doesn't affect things on the outside. > > The problem with RDF/XML is that it had an exalted position in the > Semantic Web realm for way too long. To this very day, many of us are > still trying to get folks to understand that RDF is neither a format nor > a dialect of XML. > > Kingsley >> >> Martynas >> graphityhq.com >> >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:03 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: >>> Side note: RDF/XML was the first RDF serialization standardized, over 15 >>> years ago, at a time when XML was all the buzz. Since then other >>> serializations have been standardized that are far more human friendly to >>> read and write, and easier for programmers to use, such as Turtle and >>> JSON-LD. >>> >>> However, even beyond ease of use, one of the biggest problems with RDF/XML >>> that I and others have seen over the years is that it misleads people into >>> thinking that RDF is a dialect of XML, and it is not. I'm sure this >>> misconception was reinforced by the unfortunate depiction of XML in the >>> foundation of the (now infamous) semantic web layer cake of 2001, which in >>> hindsight is just plain wrong: >>> http://www.w3.org/2001/09/06-ecdl/slide17-0.html >>> (Admittedly JSON-LD may run a similar risk, but I think that risk is >>> mitigated now by the fact that RDF is already more established in its own >>> right.) >>> >>> I encourage all RDF publishers to use one of the other standard RDF formats >>> such as Turtle or JSON-LD. All commonly used RDF tools now support Turtle, >>> and many or most already support JSON-LD. >>> >>> RDF/XML is not officially deprecated, but I personally hope that in the next >>> round of RDF updates, we will quietly thank RDF/XML for its faithful service >>> and mark it as deprecated. >>> >>> David Booth >>> >> > > > -- > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com > Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this > > -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, eScience Lab School of Computer Science The University of Manchester http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/ http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718
Received on Friday, 4 September 2015 10:03:10 UTC