- From: Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2014 12:28:13 +0200
- To: "'Richard Cyganiak'" <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: <public-lod@w3.org>, "'SW-forum Web'" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Thanks for the clarifications! > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Richard Cyganiak [mailto:richard@cyganiak.de] > Inviato: venerd́ 4 luglio 2014 11:59 > A: Armando Stellato > Cc: public-lod@w3.org; SW-forum Web > Oggetto: Re: two questions about VoID > > Hi Armando, > > On 4 Jul 2014, at 10:52, Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it> wrote: > > I would like to get confirmed is if the definition of void:Dataset is including > owl vocabularies. > > Yes, it would be fair to say that owl:Ontology is a subset of void:Dataset, > because every such ontology can be fully represented as a set of RDF triples. > > > All examples in the void specifications (http://www.w3.org/TR/void/), and > the definition in section 8 (http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#cheatsheet ) seem > to suggest the structure of a triple for this property is: > > > > dataset void:subset subset_of_dataset > > > > …but in section 5.2 (http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#linkset-subset ) it is > being used in the opposite way: > > > > :DBpedia_Geonames a void:Linkset; > > void:target :DBpedia; > > void:target :Geonames; > > void:subset :DBpedia; > > void:triples 252000; > > . > > > > Can anyone confirm if it is the use in 5.2 being wrong? > > Yes, the example is wrong. > > Best, > Richard
Received on Friday, 4 July 2014 10:28:34 UTC