- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:53:07 +0100
- To: Heiko Paulheim <heiko@informatik.uni-mannheim.de>
- Cc: Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, "public-lod@w3.org community" <public-lod@w3.org>, Bernd Opitz <opitz.bernd@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <CADjV5jdUA0nOHvcSndPHkCWYRXgcPLD1wuv9RYekReEQZvYv0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Heiko, Unless you want to use another ontology (e.g. BIO [1][2] or schema.org[3]), I'd probably go ahead and break that contract, although it is not technically safe (AFAIK, it's a violation of OWL semantics). It depends on the expected consumption of your data. I would say that the vcard ontology formally needs to be fixed to allow for more variation. It actually seems to have been amended somewhat in 2010 [4], to at least not require the exact second (or fraction thereof) of the birth. But that's hardly enough. A lot of the point of datatyped literals in RDF is lost when datatype properties are locked down like this. Cheers, Niklas [1]: http://vocab.org/bio/0.1/.html [2]: http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/BirthdayIssue [3]: http://schema.org/birthDate [4]: http://www.w3.org/Submission/2010/SUBM-vcard-rdf-20100120/ On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Heiko Paulheim < heiko@informatik.uni-mannheim.de> wrote: > Hi Jerven, > > this looks like a pragmatic solution. But I wonder if it may lead to any > conflicts, e.g., the vcard ontology defines the bday property with > xsd:dateTime as its range explicitly. Is it "safe" to simply use an > xsd:gYear value as its object? > > Best, > Heiko > > > > Am 10.02.2014 15:43, schrieb Jerven Bolleman: > > Hi Heiko, >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#gYear and http://www.w3.org/TR/ >> xmlschema-2/#gYeargYearMonth >> are the datatypes that you should use. >> >> Regards, >> Jerven >> >> On 10 Feb 2014, at 15:37, Heiko Paulheim <heiko@informatik.uni- >> mannheim.de> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >>> >>> xsd:dateTime and xsd:date are used frequently for encoding dates in RDF, >>> e.g., for birthdays in the vcard ontology [1]. Is there any best practice >>> to encode incomplete date information, e.g., if only the birth *year* of a >>> person is known? >>> >>> As far as I can see, the XSD spec enforces the provision of all date >>> components [2], but "1997-01-01" seems like a semantically wrong way of >>> expressing that someone is born in 1997, but the author does not know >>> exactly when. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Heiko >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#dateTime >>> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#date >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Heiko Paulheim >>> Research Group Data and Web Science >>> University of Mannheim >>> Phone: +49 621 181 2646 >>> B6, 26, Room C1.08 >>> D-68159 Mannheim >>> >>> Mail: heiko@informatik.uni-mannheim.de >>> Web: www.heikopaulheim.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- > Dr. Heiko Paulheim > Research Group Data and Web Science > University of Mannheim > Phone: +49 621 181 2646 > B6, 26, Room C1.08 > D-68159 Mannheim > > Mail: heiko@informatik.uni-mannheim.de > Web: www.heikopaulheim.com > > >
Received on Monday, 10 February 2014 15:54:09 UTC