- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 09:23:05 +0200
- To: "Dawson, Laura" <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>
- Cc: Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>, Steve Pettifer <steve.pettifer@manchester.ac.uk>, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>, Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABevsUFT2t3tXHo8XfreYZkjsT9kVUvZ9VB_-v4c69hPsGRMVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dear all, Thank you for the comments on Open Annotation! We agree, of course, that fragments are extremely important. In Open Annotation we have a hybrid approach consisting of three parts: * If the resource can be described solely using fragments, then we promote that. http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/core.html#FragmentURIs * However there are situations when we need more information than can be provided in a fragment, such as also adding the time of the representation or providing style information for the segment, then we introduce a FragmentSelector resource that provides the fragment syntax along with this additional information. http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/specific.html#FragmentSelector * And then there are the situations where the fragment syntax isn't sufficient or doesn't exist. For example circles or arbitrary paths in spatial dimensions, arbitrary text in any textual resource, or selections in resources with media types that do not have fragment definitions at all. In these cases we have to look elsewhere, and use additional Selector resources. http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/specific.html#Selectors We would be very happy for additional engagement and discussion in this area as to best practices and recommendations. http://www.w3.org/community/openannotation/ Rob Sanderson On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Dawson, Laura <Laura.Dawson@bowker.com>wrote: > Short DOIs for fragment IDs? > > From: Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> > Date: Thursday, May 2, 2013 4:33 PM > To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> > Cc: Steve Pettifer <steve.pettifer@manchester.ac.uk>, Sarven Capadisli < > info@csarven.ca>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org> > Subject: Re: Final CFP: In-Use Track ISWC 2013 > Resent-From: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org> > Resent-Date: Thursday, May 2, 2013 4:34 PM > > Open annotation is great. Really powerful and well designed ontology > and model. It doesn't replace fragment ids, however. Both are necessary: > frag ids to link with in simple use cases (e.g. HTML) and the other one to > annotate properly. > A bridge between them would be nice. > > All the best, > Sebastian > > Am 02.05.2013 18:00, schrieb Paul Groth: > > Hi Sebastien, > > I use latex as well. Utopia is a pdf reader. > > But utopia does support referencing bits of the pdf. As I understand, > they are moving to extending the open annotation ontology. I've cc'd Steve > Pettifer who created Utopia and who will known the ins-and-outs. > > Currently, they store all the annotations separately. > > Thanks > Paul > > > > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Sebastian Hellmann < > hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote: > >> Hi Paul, >> personally for me latex works best, because it has good editors and >> support for description logic formulas. Plus it is widely used and quite >> good for PDF typesetting. >> >> It would be really swell to be able to address content within PDF with >> identifiers. Did Utopia solve that problem? >> >> I am asking along the lines of >> - mediafragments [1] >> - RFC 5147 text fragment identifier (see the example at the bottom of [2]) >> - xpointer/xpath [3] >> >> If yes, I would like to use it immediately. There are plans to convert >> the Google Mention corpus (which includes PDF's) to NIF [2] . >> The PDF Open Parameters provided by [4] are way too simple. >> >> All the best, >> Sebastian >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ >> [2] (example is at the bottom of .ttl file) >> http://persistence.uni-leipzig.org/nlp2rdf/ontologies/nif-core >> [3] e.g. http://example.com/exampledoc.html#xpath(/html/body >> [1]/h2[1]/span[1]/text()[1]) >> [4] >> http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/acrobat/PDFOpenParameters.pdf#page=7 >> >> Am 02.05.2013 12:55, schrieb Paul Groth: >> >> Hi Sarven, >> >> Beyond the PDF for me is moving beyond the current research >> communication system as highlighted by the Force 11 manifesto ( >> http://www.force11.org/white_paper). This includes adopting technologies >> that augment/extend (i.e. go beyond) existing technologies. For example, >> making data easily accessible and citable, providing links to online >> content, making multiple perspectives on content available, exposing >> provenance, using altmetrics. I'm very influenced by the work on Utopia ( >> http://utopiadocs.com) so that's why I think using pdfs are fine - you >> can do a lot with them as they stand - and for a certain form of >> communication (written long form text) they work well. As technologist we >> need to make sure that these new technologies work well in the environment >> and connect to other things. >> >> cheers >> Paul >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>wrote: >> >>> On 05/02/2013 12:23 PM, Paul Groth wrote: >>> >>>> I think Harry makes the point better than I can. >>>> >>> >>> Paul, I have one last question for you if you don't mind, because it >>> seems like you are not interested in playing this out and I don't want to >>> bother you further: what does "beyond the PDF" mean to you? >>> >>> -Sarven >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) >> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ >> Assistant Professor >> - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science >> - The Network Institute >> VU University Amsterdam >> >> >> >> -- >> Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann >> Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig >> Events: NLP & DBpedia 2013 (http://nlp-dbpedia2013.blogs.aksw.org, >> Deadline: *July 8th*) >> Venha para a Alemanha como PhD: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/csf >> Projects: http://nlp2rdf.org , http://linguistics.okfn.org , >> http://dbpedia.org/Wiktionary , http://dbpedia.org >> Homepage: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann >> Research Group: http://aksw.org >> > > > > -- > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl) > http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/ > Assistant Professor > - Web & Media Group | Department of Computer Science > - The Network Institute > VU University Amsterdam > > > > -- > Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann > Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig > Events: NLP & DBpedia 2013 (http://nlp-dbpedia2013.blogs.aksw.org, > Deadline: *July 8th*) > Venha para a Alemanha como PhD: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/csf > Projects: http://nlp2rdf.org , http://linguistics.okfn.org , > http://dbpedia.org/Wiktionary , http://dbpedia.org > Homepage: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann > Research Group: http://aksw.org >
Received on Friday, 3 May 2013 07:23:33 UTC