- From: Daniel Schwabe <dschwabe@inf.puc-rio.br>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 09:32:49 -0300
- To: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
It's not only submission that must be taken into account. For example, as a reviewer I don't want to be forced to read the paper online... How do you envisage this being handled? Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote: >On 04/26/2013 01:04 AM, Andrea Splendiani wrote: >> ok, from this the previous Kingsley post, you suggest metadata as annotation, and not structuring the content of the paper per se. >> Maybe one idea could be to provide a (x)html+RDFa (or even only a Turtle) template to fill for the submission. This, we can do... >> Should we draft one ? > >Drafting an XHTML+RDFa template plus the CSS which gives a view like in >ACM or LNCS templates is not the core problem at hand. In fact, I've >already created and used them in the past [1], [2] - print view in >Firefox or Chromium (layout may require some updates). Surely, they can >be improved but it is a pretty good starting point in my point. > >If conferences are not welcoming XHTML+RDFa as one of (if not the only) >formats, there is no point in investing more time. > >IMO, it would be great to get some "official" responses to [3] and then >we can follow through as to what's really needed to keep everyone happy. > >[1] http://csarven.ca/graphpusher >[2] http://csarven.ca/statistical-linked-dataspaces >[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2013Apr/0359.html > >-Sarven > > >
Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 12:33:06 UTC