Re: Publication of scientific research

It's not only submission that must be taken into account. For example, as a reviewer I don't want to be forced to read the paper online... How do you envisage this being handled?

Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca> wrote:

>On 04/26/2013 01:04 AM, Andrea Splendiani wrote:
>> ok, from this the previous Kingsley post, you suggest metadata as annotation, and not structuring the content of the paper per se.
>> Maybe one idea could be to provide a (x)html+RDFa (or even only a Turtle) template to fill for the submission. This, we can do...
>> Should we draft one ?
>
>Drafting an XHTML+RDFa template plus the CSS which gives a view like in 
>ACM or LNCS templates is not the core problem at hand. In fact, I've 
>already created and used them in the past [1], [2] - print view in 
>Firefox or Chromium (layout may require some updates). Surely, they can 
>be improved but it is a pretty good starting point in my point.
>
>If conferences are not welcoming XHTML+RDFa as one of (if not the only) 
>formats, there is no point in investing more time.
>
>IMO, it would be great to get some "official" responses to [3] and then 
>we can follow through as to what's really needed to keep everyone happy.
>
>[1] http://csarven.ca/graphpusher
>[2] http://csarven.ca/statistical-linked-dataspaces
>[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2013Apr/0359.html
>
>-Sarven
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 26 April 2013 12:33:06 UTC