- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:23:49 +0200
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <51781525.5090505@csarven.ca>
On 04/24/2013 05:37 PM, Andrea Splendiani wrote: > There two main issues in moving beyond pdf. > > One, probably minor, is that there are larger constraints. Some > people need their work to be somewhere "understood" by their > organization. This is a bit less relevant for conferences than for > journals, but still an issue. > > The other is that some bit of a research paper can lend to > formalization. But there is a lot of variability. In some case you > are closer to what web languages can represent. E.g.: a finding in > RDF, some algorithm shown in JavaScript,... But what is somebody is > publishing a description of an information systems ? It may get so > far from a standard way to talk about think that you won't gain much > with a structured representation. > > pdf + other technologies, when it applies, could be a good idea, > though. I can't quite make out the core of the issues that you are trying to describe. So, from I understand: We could maybe at least give this HTML thing a try. And, later worry about semantic alignments? IMHO, there is no compelling reason to research and try PDF + other technologies, when we have HTML+RDF + other technologies already in place and staring right at us. -Sarven
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2013 17:24:21 UTC