Re: SPARQL, philosophy n'stuff..

Sure. But I think it's a little unfair to the specification when, unlike 
SPARQL-by-GET there is no requirement for a graph or any other 
constructed parameter.

Barry


On 22/04/13 09:54, Leigh Dodds wrote:
> Hi Barry,
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Barry Norton <barry.norton@ontotext.com> wrote:
>> I'm sorry, but you seem to have misunderstood the use of a graph URI
>> parameter in indirect graph addressing for GSP.
>>
>> I wish all GSP actions addressed graphs directly, Queries were all GETs, and
>> that Updates were all PATCH documents, but a degree of pragmatism has been
>> applied.
> I think Mark's point was that SPARQL 1.1/GSP specify a fixed query
> parameter (query, graph) in the specification, requiring clients to
> construct URIs rather than using hypermedia.
>
> Cheers,
>
> L.
>
> --
> Leigh Dodds
> Freelance Technologist
> Open Data, Linked Data Geek
> t: @ldodds
> w: ldodds.com
> e: leigh@ldodds.com
>

Received on Monday, 22 April 2013 09:15:47 UTC