- From: Jürgen Jakobitsch SWC <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:35:16 +0200
- To: Claus Stadler <cstadler@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Simpler subsets may not be powerful enough for use cases, and I guess people will at some point realize that if they start small, as soon as they start adding new features (filters, joins, etcs) they are starting to reinvent SPARQL. true I think the problem is that many people (especially web developers) have not yet realized that SPARQL *IS* already a REST API and - because of the standardization - the lingua franca for (Semantic) Web data access. true and probably more "true"s below, but these stand out :-) "i don't worry about api anymore...", see here [1] wkr jürgen [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2012Jul/0187.html -- | Jürgen Jakobitsch, | Software Developer | Semantic Web Company GmbH | Mariahilfer Straße 70 / Neubaugasse 1, Top 8 | A - 1070 Wien, Austria | Mob +43 676 62 12 710 | Fax +43.1.402 12 35 - 22 COMPANY INFORMATION | web : http://www.semantic-web.at/ | foaf : http://company.semantic-web.at/person/juergen_jakobitsch PERSONAL INFORMATION | web : http://www.turnguard.com | foaf : http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard | g+ : https://plus.google.com/111233759991616358206/posts | skype : jakobitsch-punkt | xmlns:tg = "http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard#"
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 14:35:55 UTC