On 2012-03 -24, at 00:47, Pat Hayes wrote: > I am sympathetic, but... > > On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:59 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote: > >> >> The proposal is that URI X denotes what the publisher of X says it denotes, whether it returns 200 or not. > > And what if the publisher simply does not say anything about what the URi denotes? After all, something like 99.999% of the URIs on the planet lack this information. What, if anything, can be concluded about what they denote? The http-range-14 rule provides an answer to this which seems reasonably intuitive. What would be your answer? Or do you think there should not be any 'default' rule in such cases? Exactly. For example, To take an arbitrary one of the trillions out there, what does http://www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?fk_files=2372108&pageno=11 identify, there being no RDF in it? What can I possibly do with that URI if the publisher has not explicitly allowed me to use it to refer to the online book, under your proposal? > > Pat >
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2012 19:26:21 UTC