- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:48:27 -0400
- To: Jonathan Rees <rees@mumble.net>
- Cc: Norman Gray <norman@astro.gla.ac.uk>, Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>, public-lod community <public-lod@w3.org>, TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>
Jonathan, I have written the below idea up as a change proposal http://www.w3.org/wiki/HTML/ChangeProposal25 The number "25" has no semantics. Tim On 2012-03 -25, at 12:35, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > [...] the basic idea of giving a way of the server making it > explicit that the URI identifies not the document but is subject, without the internet round-trip time of 303, > is a useful path to go down. > > If Ian Davis and co would be happy with it, how about a header > > 200 OK > Document: foo123476;doc=yes > > which means "Actually the URI you gave is not the URI of a this document, > but the URI of this document is foo123476.html (a relative URI). > > - This is the same as doing a 301 to foo123476.html and returning the same content. > - Non-data clients will ignore it, and just show users the page anyway. > - Saves the round trip time of 301 > - Avoids having the same URI for the document and its subject. > > This will dismantle HTTP range-14 a bit more, but still never give the same > URI to two things. It would mean code changes to my client code and just a reconfig > change to Ian's server. > > Tim > > >
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2012 17:48:48 UTC