Re: Change Proposal for HttpRange-14

Thanks James,

I've substituted that text in.

Jeni

On 24 Mar 2012, at 12:38, James Leigh wrote:

> On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 08:11 +0000, Jeni Tennison wrote:
>> Can I just cast that into the language used by the rest of the proposal? What about:
>> 
>>        when documentation is served with a 200 response from a probe
>>        URI and does not contain a 'describedby' statement, some agents 
>>        (including the publisher) might use it to identify the documentation
>>        and others a non-information resource. Publishers still need to 
>>        provide support for two distinct URIs if they want to enable more
>>        consistent use of the URI.
>> 
>> How does that sound?
>> 
> 
> I'd buy into that.
> 
> Regards,
> James
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com

Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 16:43:29 UTC