- From: James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:38:52 -0400
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: public-lod community <public-lod@w3.org>
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 08:11 +0000, Jeni Tennison wrote: > Can I just cast that into the language used by the rest of the proposal? What about: > > when documentation is served with a 200 response from a probe > URI and does not contain a 'describedby' statement, some agents > (including the publisher) might use it to identify the documentation > and others a non-information resource. Publishers still need to > provide support for two distinct URIs if they want to enable more > consistent use of the URI. > > How does that sound? > I'd buy into that. Regards, James
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 12:39:21 UTC