- From: James Leigh <james@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:36:04 -0400
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: public-lod community <public-lod@w3.org>
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 16:43 +0000, Jeni Tennison wrote: > Thanks James, > > I've substituted that text in. > Thanks, The document makes it unclear how an agent should handle provenance for NIR URI with a 200 response. If a :describedby relationship exists, should an agent assume that the object of that relationship contains the same information the probe URI response does? Is it okay for a single agent to use the probe URI (with a 200 response) as both an identifier for the documentation and an identifier for the NIR it describes? Regards, James
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 17:36:34 UTC