Re: Change Proposal for HttpRange-14

On 24 March 2012 10:20, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com> wrote:

> BTW the fact that AFAIK there is no broadly used URI for the class of IRs
> (causing me to use foaf:Document in the above) may indicate how frequently
> people do in fact make the httpRange-14 inference in a way that is
> accessible to the rest of the stack.

I'd suggest the reason there's no broadly used URI for such a class,
is that there is no coherently defined class that plausibly divides up
the world into IRs and non-IRs. If we had consensus on the latter, and
if it were a useful distinction, I'm sure there'd be a class for it by
now.

Dan

Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 10:43:23 UTC