- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:42:54 +0000
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net>, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, public-lod community <public-lod@w3.org>, Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com>, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
On 24 March 2012 10:20, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com> wrote: > BTW the fact that AFAIK there is no broadly used URI for the class of IRs > (causing me to use foaf:Document in the above) may indicate how frequently > people do in fact make the httpRange-14 inference in a way that is > accessible to the rest of the stack. I'd suggest the reason there's no broadly used URI for such a class, is that there is no coherently defined class that plausibly divides up the world into IRs and non-IRs. If we had consensus on the latter, and if it were a useful distinction, I'm sure there'd be a class for it by now. Dan
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 10:43:23 UTC