- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 07:11:16 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F6DABD4.5090506@openlinksw.com>
On 3/24/12 6:28 AM, Dan Brickley wrote: > I don't believe we'll ever come up with a clear distinction between > 'description' and 'representation', such that we can say "look, Dan's > homepage, you get a proper representation of it across the wire, ... > whereas a physical book, you're merely getting a description". BTW - great post! Re. the above, how about seeing a 'description' as a kind of 'representation'. Thus, you can have 'representations' of web pages which are Web medium artifacts and 'descriptions' for everything else that isn't a Web medium artifact. Likewise, we can even get folks to accept/understand that 'definitions' are a kind of 'description' too. Underutilized predicates such as: wdrs:describedby and rdfs:isDefinedBy, capture the semantics of the statement above. Ditto partitioning of relations across the TBox and Abox in knowledge management. Links: 1. http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-description-and-vs-definition/ -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Saturday, 24 March 2012 11:11:41 UTC