- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 19:10:12 -0400
- To: Leyla Jael García Castro <leyla.jael.garcia@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 23:10:41 UTC
What are you trying to accomplish - how would you decide one solution is better than some other? On Tuesday, July 3, 2012, Leyla Jael García Castro wrote: > Hi all, > > I am modelling the structure and content of document. I am using DoCO ( > http://purl.org/spar/doco<http://www.essepuntato.it/lode/http://purl.org/spar/doco>) > for the structure, i.e. Section, Paragraph, etc. > Now I need to model the actual content in a paragraph, meaning the text in > it. Here an example: > > <myDocumentURI> pattern:contains [ a doco:Section > ; pattern:contains [ a doco:Paragraph > ; -content property- "This is the text in the paragraph." ] ] . > > What would be the best approach to do that? *bibo:content* ( > http://bibliontology.com/) is deprecated so I do not want to use that > one; the recommendation there is to use *rdf:value*, that would be an > alternative. *sioc:conten*t is another alternative. It could also be * > c4o:hasContent* (http://purl.org/spar/c4o). I guess there are also other > alternatives out there. > > Which one would be the best alternative? Any suggestions? > > Thanks so much, > > lj >
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 23:10:41 UTC