- From: Sebastian Hellmann <hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:37:23 +0200
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- CC: Leyla Jael García Castro <leyla.jael.garcia@gmail.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi Alan, you are right. That is probably the correct question to answer lj's query. lj, do you have a use case or a specific application in mind? What kind of queries do you want to answer with the model and the data you have? All the best, Sebastian Am 05.07.2012 01:10, schrieb Alan Ruttenberg: > What are you trying to accomplish - how would you decide one solution is > better than some other? > > On Tuesday, July 3, 2012, Leyla Jael García Castro wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am modelling the structure and content of document. I am using DoCO ( >> http://purl.org/spar/doco<http://www.essepuntato.it/lode/http://purl.org/spar/doco>) >> for the structure, i.e. Section, Paragraph, etc. >> Now I need to model the actual content in a paragraph, meaning the text in >> it. Here an example: >> >> <myDocumentURI> pattern:contains [ a doco:Section >> ; pattern:contains [ a doco:Paragraph >> ; -content property- "This is the text in the paragraph." ] ] . >> >> What would be the best approach to do that? *bibo:content* ( >> http://bibliontology.com/) is deprecated so I do not want to use that >> one; the recommendation there is to use *rdf:value*, that would be an >> alternative. *sioc:conten*t is another alternative. It could also be * >> c4o:hasContent* (http://purl.org/spar/c4o). I guess there are also other >> alternatives out there. >> >> Which one would be the best alternative? Any suggestions? >> >> Thanks so much, >> >> lj >> -- Dipl. Inf. Sebastian Hellmann Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig Events: http://wole2012.eurecom.fr (*Deadline: July 31st 2012*) Projects: http://nlp2rdf.org , http://dbpedia.org Homepage: http://bis.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/SebastianHellmann Research Group: http://aksw.org
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2012 10:37:51 UTC