- From: Paul Wilton <paul.wilton@ontoba.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:49:07 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
what is this IE6 that you talk about ? :) On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 10/18/11 1:49 PM, Jonathan Rees wrote: >> >> I'm not trying to be difficult, I just really don't get what you're >> saying. >> >>> > I believe the your quests was about a case for 303's. Which is >>> > basically >>> > another way of seeking a case for slash terminated URIs re. Linked >>> > Data >>> > deployment. >> >> Not exactly - I'm trying to build a case against hash URIs. > > A case against hash URIs is that your deployment won't play well with IE 6. > The problem with IE 6 is that it sends # over the wire. Other browsers > don't. Thus, you (the publisher) has extra work on your hands should you > want your Linked Data deployment to cater to IE 6 users. This is why DBpedia > opted to use slash URIs since that meant a single set of re-write rules > without any exception oriented heuristics for IE 6 user agents. > > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > President& CEO > OpenLink Software > Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 12:49:41 UTC