- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:07:07 -0400
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 12:07:31 UTC
On 10/18/11 1:49 PM, Jonathan Rees wrote: > I'm not trying to be difficult, I just really don't get what you're saying. > >> > I believe the your quests was about a case for 303's. Which is basically >> > another way of seeking a case for slash terminated URIs re. Linked Data >> > deployment. > Not exactly - I'm trying to build a case against hash URIs. A case against hash URIs is that your deployment won't play well with IE 6. The problem with IE 6 is that it sends # over the wire. Other browsers don't. Thus, you (the publisher) has extra work on your hands should you want your Linked Data deployment to cater to IE 6 users. This is why DBpedia opted to use slash URIs since that meant a single set of re-write rules without any exception oriented heuristics for IE 6 user agents. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 12:07:31 UTC