W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Schema.org in RDF ... expected Types in RDFS

From: Daniel Schwabe <dschwabe@inf.puc-rio.br>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:27:02 -0300
Cc: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, "<public-lod@w3.org> community" <public-lod@w3.org>, Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
Message-Id: <8A3D544C-53AB-4C0A-A6BB-5EC37A9C6DAD@inf.puc-rio.br>
To: Patrick Logan <patrickdlogan@gmail.com>
Right, I thought as much. Which makes the point of schema.rdf.org vocabulary support by the parsers even more critical to encourage its adoption...

D
On Jun 6, 2011, at 14:19  - 06/06/11, Patrick Logan wrote:

> Google has advised against "mixing markup" because it "confuses their
> parsers". I have not seen similar advice from the other two vendors.
> 
> (Which strikes me as odd, but nevertheless...)
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Daniel Schwabe <dschwabe@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
>> Martin,
>> I can see the point with Good Relations - they acknowledge they will continue supporting RDFa *with the vocabularies they already support*.
>> My question then was about RDFa support for *schema.rdf.org* vocabulary.
>> Also, Gio's question is applicable - can one have page markups with both RDFa and schema.org?
>> 
>> Cheers
>> D
>> 
Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 17:27:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:21:13 UTC