Re: Common RDF Vocabulary Labels Vocabulary

Well, yes, it is about annotations if you like, but annotations are triples and it is copying triples.
And David actually gives a good reason for not copying them.

Or in fact not actually copying:
 <rdf:Property rdf:about="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/phone" vs:term_status="testing" rdfs:label="phone" rdfs:comment="A phone,  specified using fully qualified tel: URI scheme (refs: http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes.html#tel).">
!==
> foaf:phone rdfs:comment "A phone number, specified using fully qualified tel: URI scheme (refs: http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes.html#tel)."

Which also is a good reason.

What goes where in a large-scale distributed system is actually an important consideration about making it effective.

We are actually doing a knowledge acquisition exercise here.
Anyone offer what the first part of the process should be?

Cheers
Hugh

On 6 Jun 2011, at 18:06, Leigh Dodds wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 6 June 2011 10:00, Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>> But hang on, is the web not about linking, rather than copying things around?
> 
> Isn't this annotation, rather than copying?
> 
> L.
> -- 
> Leigh Dodds
> Programme Manager, Talis Platform
> Mobile: 07850 928381
> http://kasabi.com
> http://talis.com
> 
> Talis Systems Ltd
> 43 Temple Row
> Birmingham
> B2 5LS
> 

-- 
Hugh Glaser,  
              Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia
              School of Electronics and Computer Science,
              University of Southampton,
              Southampton SO17 1BJ
Work: +44 23 8059 3670, Fax: +44 23 8059 3045
Mobile: +44 75 9533 4155 , Home: +44 23 8061 5652
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~hg/

Received on Monday, 6 June 2011 17:17:40 UTC