Re: CAS, DUNS and LOD (was Re: Cost/Benefit Anyone? Re: Vote for my Semantic Web presentation at SXSW)

On Aug 24, 2011, at 2:44, Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 23 August 2011 15:17, Gannon Dick <gannon_dick@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Either "Linked Data ecosystem" or "linked data Ecosystem" is a dangerously flawed paradigm, IMHO.  You don't "improve" MeSH by
>> flattening it, for example, it is what it is. Since CAS numbers are not a directed graph, an algorithmic transform to a URI (which *is* a
>> directed graph) is risks the creation of a "new" irreconcilable taxonomy.  For example, Nitrogen is ok to breathe and liquid Nitrogen is a
>> not very practical way to chill wine.
> 
> A URI isn't a directed graph. You can use them to build one by making
> statements though.
> 
> Setting aside any copyright issues, the CAS identifiers are useful
> Natural Keys [1]. As they're well deployed, using them to create URIs
> [2] is sensible

Hi Leigh,

Right.  Unfortunately it is also illegal :/

Regards,
Dave


> as it simplifies the process of linking between
> datasets [3].
> 
> To answer Patrick's question, to help bridging between systems that
> only use the original literal version, rather than the URIs, then we
> should ensure that the literal keys are included in the data [4].
> 
> These are well deployed patterns and, from my experience, make it
> really simple and easy to bridge and link between different datasets
> and systems.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> L.
> 
> [1]. http://patterns.dataincubator.org/book/natural-keys.html
> [2]. http://patterns.dataincubator.org/book/patterned-uris.html
> [3]. http://patterns.dataincubator.org/book/shared-keys.html
> [4]. http://patterns.dataincubator.org/book/literal-keys.html
> 
> -- 
> Leigh Dodds
> Programme Manager, Talis Platform
> Mobile: 07850 928381
> http://kasabi.com
> http://talis.com
> 
> Talis Systems Ltd
> 43 Temple Row
> Birmingham
> B2 5LS
> 

Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2011 14:41:03 UTC