- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 13:02:08 +0100
- To: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
On 8 Apr 2011, at 08:11, Michael Brunnbauer wrote: > I would prefer a way of skolemizing that does not depend on the graph name > and can be done by producer *and* consumer of RDF on a voluntary base. > It should be a standard with reference implementations in all important > languages for: > > -generating a skolem URI > -converting an unskolemized RDF serialization to a skolemized one > -converting a skolemized RDF serialization to an unskolemized one > > It is important that skolem URIs would be recognizeable. I tend to think that the best we can do w.r.t. blank nodes is exactly what you describe above, plus some guidance in the core RDF specs along the lines of [1] and [2]. On skolemization, Sandro started a document here [3] which perhaps could be shaped into some sort of draft. Best, Richard [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2011Mar/0068.html [2] http://richard.cyganiak.de/blog/2011/03/blank-nodes-considered-harmful/ [3] http://www.w3.org/wiki/BnodeSkolomization
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 12:04:05 UTC