- From: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 10:28:22 +0100
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Cc: <nathan@webr3.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, foaf-protocols <foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org>
On 20 Apr 2010, at 08:47, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > Nathan, > > That sort of reminds me of something [1] ;) > > So, I asked a round a bit [2] and the answer essentially was: go register > one ... fancy doing it together? The latest document draft-nottingham is here btw http://cidr-report.org/ietf/idref/draft-nottingham-http-link-header/ One could just register it by adding the relation in the acl ontology such as acl:rules a rdf:Property; rdf:domain foaf:Document; rdf:range foaf:Document; ... As you can see in the 5.5 examples, you can have a rel value as a URL. ( So in this it is similar to atom). The only disadvantage then is that you don't get the nice shorthand, for inclusion in Atom XML, and other documents. So I suppose the best would be to add the relation first to the ontology, work out a good wording for it, test it out, then ask for the IETF shorthand, the put an owl:sameAs link to the ietf one, which hopefully we can then convince them to serve up as linked data. I'd be happy to support a document for the link. It seems to me the Atom folks could find that very useful. Not sure yet how cold they are towards rdf still. Henry > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] http://webofdata.wordpress.com/2010/03/04/wod-access-control-discovery/ > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2010JanMar/0218.html > > -- > Dr. Michael Hausenblas > LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute > NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway > Ireland, Europe > Tel. +353 91 495730 > http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ > http://sw-app.org/about.html > > > >> From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> >> Organization: webr3 >> Reply-To: <nathan@webr3.org> >> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 22:37:41 +0100 >> To: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, foaf-protocols >> <foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org> >> Subject: [foaf-protocols] ACL >> >> Hi All, >> >> I'm just trying to get an implementation of web access control [1] off >> the ground and have hit upon a small issue. >> >> I'm planning on exposing links to acl files via the Link header as >> directed, however I've realised there is no rel="" for it, hence i was >> opting for a custom temporary type. On a first look a relation of >> acl:acl looks to be the one, but after checking the actual ontology the >> acl:acl link simply isn't there, thus in the meantime I've opted for: >> >> Link: </.wac/everyone.n3>; rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#"; >> title="Access Control File" >> >> Any improvements, or refinements welcome, as the above is just a >> temporary measure. >> >> Best, >> >> Nathan >> _______________________________________________ >> foaf-protocols mailing list >> foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org >> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols > >
Received on Tuesday, 20 April 2010 09:28:57 UTC